Tag Archives: Specialists

Agen Sabung Ayam – From militant doctors to angry lawyers, specialists are the new union barons | Simon Jenkins

Agen Sabung Ayam

Some years back the NHS attempted to kill me. I was batted back and forth among my neighborhood GP and the nearest hospital more than a cancer verify-up. In desperation, I lastly went private. A cancer was identified and removed in time. Had I stuck with the NHS I would almost certainly have been one more statistic in Britain’s dire record for late diagnosis and death.

Associated: Robot physicians, on the web lawyers and automated architects: the future of the professions?

It was not genuinely the NHS’s fault. The delay lay in the healthcare restrictive practice whereby the GP could not order an endoscopy but must “refer” me to a hospital, where consultants worked to their personal schedules of comfort and remuneration. I lost any romantic attachment I when had to the NHS.

Since the 1980s, “trade union” restrictive practices have been largely dismantled in Britain. This was a great thing. It produced the economy much more versatile and a lot more effective. It is why you can nonetheless study papers such as the Guardian. It dismantled 1 kind of restriction, that of manual and skilled workers largely in the private sector.

Yet no 1, from Thatcher onwards, has confronted those middle-class unions decorously recognized as the professions. Now threatened by a pincer movement of technologies and austerity, their practices are coming to light. They are turning to militancy in self-defence, some with techniques that would make a Scargill blush.

Nowadays, we expect to discover that junior hospital doctors have voted for the very first time to strike against the NHS. They are the tip of an iceberg: lawyers, scientists, generals – even those new kings of the public sector, nationalised bankers – are fighting against new regulation. The steady advance of government into skilled solutions signifies that the larger salariat has come to rely ever much more on state money. It is bringing out the exact same survival instinct as the 1980s did in the miners and steelworkers.

Professions used to get their way by relying on the public’s instinctive deference towards their mystical capabilities. What a medical doctor or a lawyer mentioned was gospel. They had been, as Shaw said, “conspiracies against the laity”, and a conspiracy that always won. When Thatcher attempted to finish the legal duopoly of barristers and solicitors, her lord chancellor, Lord Havers, declared it the “first moral issue on which I felt I had to defy my party whip”. It was straight log-rolling, but Thatcher capitulated.

Technology can analyse and resolve numerous of life’s troubles that utilized to default to human knowledge

This deference is collapsing. Most men and women uncover it challenging to see what’s so awful about the new junior doctors’ contract – it compounds a assortment of exploitable practices, such as excessive overtime pay, into 1 salary. The important to a British profession is that its payment roots are medieval and infinitely inflatable. It depends not on the salary but on the clock.

For the past year criminal lawyers have campaigned furiously over cuts to legal aid, the expense of which has soared to 20 instances Europe’s typical. They will campaign equally strongly against providing solicitors rights of audience in court. Why use 1 lawyer when the state will spend for two?

Other folks pile in right after the physicians and lawyers. Massive science’s lobbyists deluge the press in defence of their grants. Soldiers breach protocol to defend weapons budgets against Labour scepticism. Spies go public in their fury at obtaining their surveillance malpractices revealed in public.

With the decline in deference, the professions are having to shift tactics. Political lobbyists, I am told, recommend their consumers not to plug their wisdom, efficiency or talent. The new buzzword is “security”. Security is the leitmotif of today’s political language. It begins at the top. David Cameron says leaving the EU would “risk Britain’s national security”. He says Jeremy Corbyn is a “threat to national security”. George Osborne’s last budget “puts safety first”. With no austerity “there is no financial safety, no national security”.

Theresa May’s surveillance powers are naturally vital for security – never does the word “liberty” cross her lips. Any reduce to London’s bloated police spending budget will, says its chief Sir Bernard Hogan-Howe, “damage the fight against terrorism”. Labour adds that police cuts would “put public safety at risk”.

Fracking, needless to say, is about “energy security”. The one particular classic trade union to cling to its privileges is that of the firefighters. As brigades across Europe are merged with emergency services, in Britain such a merger would “endanger security”. To the fire brigades union, “They slash, you burn.”

The government lacks the guts to confront these new union barons. But a true threat to the professions comes from the marketplace and its accomplice, the web. Half of female individuals admit to consulting “Dr Google” before going to a surgery, exactly where they have a tendency to challenge doctors over their symptoms. Medicine is becoming a conversation, not a ritual.

Richard and Daniel Susskind’s new book, The Future of the Professions, is full of warning. “The information revolution,” they say, “is undertaking for the professions what machines did for manual workers.” To the Susskinds most professions nowadays are “unaffordable, disempowering, ethically challengeable, underperforming and inscrutable.” Law, accountancy, medicine and teaching are being transformed by the internet. Roll on Google, robotics and self-support.

Of some of this I am sceptical. Electronics cannot completely replace the wisdom of expertise, on which most men and women thankfully still rely. But the Susskinds have to be correct in saying that technology can analyse and resolve several of life’s troubles that utilised to default to human knowledge. There is sufficient information offered to empower the laity to strike back at Shaw’s conspirators.

Meanwhile, skilled restrictive practices develop ever more indefensible. I firmly believe they are to blame for Britain’s poor cancer record. Increasingly, people will merely sidestep them, in search of on the internet drugs and option therapies. We will opt for mediation not law. London neighbourhoods are losing self-confidence in local police and hiring their own, who do not insist on walking in pairs “for factors of security”. Universities are springing up that teach full-time, without having wasting half the student year although teachers “do research” or take holidays.

Creating funds by generating the public really feel uncomfortable or afraid is a professional travesty. It is not just cynical. It will at some point fail the test of the industry. The cult of safety can cry wolf as well usually. When my government tells me each and every week that a terrorist attack is “likely” or “certain” or even “imminent”, I no longer fear the terrorist. I worry the government.

Agen Sabung Ayam – Bomb Specialists Analyze the Soda-Can Bomb Photo

Agen Sabung Ayam


A photograph from Dabiq, the Islamic State’s on-line magazine, purporting to show the improvised explosive device utilized to bring down a Russian airliner more than the Sinai Peninsula final month.Credit

How could a soda can bring down a passenger jet?

The Islamic State circulated a picture of what it said was an improvised explosive device employed to blow up a Russian passenger plane over the Sinai Peninsula final month, killing all 224 people on board. The device, as photographed, is created to masquerade as a typical beverage can.

There is no publicly obtainable proof that this device — pictured in the most current problem of Dabiq, the Islamic State’s propaganda magazine — was in reality associated to the downing of the Russian jet. The photograph could be calculated misinformation, intended to impress the terrorist group’s rank and file or prospective recruits and to distract law enforcement officials.

The New York Times asked career bomb-disposal technicians for their 1st impressions of the pictured device, with the understanding that the photograph is of marginal quality and not all the components can be clearly seen.

The answers had been constant: The device depicted is absolutely nothing new or surprising, and it would not be challenging for an knowledgeable bomb maker to create.

The component noticed on the proper, with black tape and a manual switch, could serve a single of a number of functions. A lot of bombs have an arming-safe switch, and a separate mechanism for initiating the blasting cap and setting off the explosion.

The wires noticed are most likely electrical connections for the blasting cap, which is shown at the center of the picture. The rest of the circuit, hidden beneath the black tape, could contain tiny batteries and the electronics essential to send an electric charge to the blasting cap at the intended moment. The blasting cap would then detonate a primary explosive charge inside the aluminum can.

The can has a hole in the bottom and shows indicators that it may well have been filled with an explosive paste. It is not probably to be a liquid bomb that may possibly demand the black-taped component either to be waterproof (it does not appear so) or to be rigged outside the can (which would make the soft-drink ruse far more vulnerable to detection). The bottom of the can appears crudely resealed and could even expose a white substance, indicating that the can’s contents are far more probably to be strong than liquid.

A thorough technical analysis is impossible from the photograph, but one disposal technician mentioned a soda can could be packed tightly with adequate high explosive to seriously harm a jetliner. Though the blast would possibly not destroy the plane outright, depending on the nature and location of the damage, it could start off a catastrophic sequence of events. A jet moving at cruising speed could then shear apart and break up.

The can has area for much more explosive than is usually identified in a regular military hand grenade — and two jets that crashed in Russia in 2004 were reported to have been brought down by grenades.

A device like this, placed aboard a passenger plane, could be detonated by a timer, by a remote-handle signal from a person on the aircraft, or by other means.

1 disposal technician mentioned that if the device have been a radio-activated bomb, that may clarify the comparatively extended wire seen in the photo: It might serve as an antenna. But after closer examination of the image, he mentioned the wires possibly just connected the blasting cap to a energy source.

Technical matters aside, it would be simpler operationally to detonate a bomb like this with a timer, since that would not require obtaining each the bomb and the bomber on board the plane.

Another bomb disposal technician mentioned that the bomb itself was not impressive, but that the photograph of it was taken cannily: With the crucial elements covered with black tape, “you can’t inform what it is below there, or what it isn’t.” He said there had been a lot of small, easy low-energy timer designs that could match beneath the tape, like one commonly utilized in Palestinian bomb making.

He mentioned the device looked significantly less sophisticated than the remote-controlled bombs that have repeatedly been noticed in Afghanistan and Iraq, which consist of attributes meant to defeat jamming and other countermeasures.

The photograph alone does absolutely nothing to establish that the Islamic State was capable to accomplish any of this. It might be another instance of the group’s adeptness at gaining interest, rather than an indication of its actual activities in the field.