BUENOS AIRES — Argentine voters handed a victory to Mauricio Macri in the country’s presidential election on Sunday, delivering a mandate to an opposition political figure looking for to roll back some of the protectionist economic measures of the departing president, Cristina Fernández de Kirchner.
With votes from 96 percent of polling areas counted, Mr. Macri, the mayor of Buenos Aires and a former president of Boca Juniors, 1 of Argentina’s most well-known soccer teams, was leading with 51.8 % of the vote, according to election officials, against 48.2 % for Daniel Scioli, a former speedboat racer and vice president under former President Néstor Kirchner, who died in 2010. Mr. Scioli conceded defeat on national television on Sunday night.
Operating a largely nonconfrontational campaign in a society that has grown increasingly polarized under Mrs. Kirchner, who succeeded her husband in 2007, Mr. Macri, 56, stunned the political establishment in October by forcing the race into a runoff and sustaining his surge in recent weeks. He ran to the right of his rivals, blending plans to overhaul the economy and promote the tolerance of different points of view on social concerns.
Mr. Macri’s relatively narrow victory revealed deep fissures in Argentina after 12 years of governance by Mrs. Kirchner and her husband, with numerous voters expressing concern over the direction of the economy and frustration with Mrs. Kirchner’s blistering attacks on critics in the news media, enterprise establishments and rival political parties.
“Cristina divided the country and destroyed it morally,” mentioned Dimitri Javakhishvili, 67, an immigrant from Georgia who operates as a doorman at a creating here in the neighborhood of Recoleta. Mr. Javakhishvili acknowledged that Mr. Macri could face challenges in attempting to govern when Mrs. Kirchner’s political movement moves into the opposition.
Still, Mr. Javakhishvili stated, “At least he’s anything new he’s one thing fresh.”
Not absolutely everyone right here shares such views. Graffiti and posters have appeared across Buenos Aires demonizing Mr. Macri, outnumbering on a lot of streets the campaign posters expressing support for Mr. Scioli, who balanced lukewarm support from Mrs. Kirchner’s loyal followers with claims that social spending could be sustained despite galloping inflation and declining private investment.
One particular instance of anti-Macri sentiment, alluding to fears that he will govern for a privileged couple of, simply says “Macrisis.”
Mr. Macri, the scion of a wealthy family, has attempted to combat perceptions that he would reverse the government’s leftist policies, saying he will keep the nationalized businesses like Aerolíneas Argentinas and YPF, Argentina’s biggest oil business, below state manage. His economic advisers have also sought to tamp down fears around contentious economic troubles like a potential currency devaluation.
In addition to grappling with inflation and currency controls aimed at curbing capital flight, Mr. Macri will now face the challenge of governing with considerably of his opposition beneath the sway of Peronism, the ideologically diverse political grouping that has dominated Argentine politics for decades.
However while Mrs. Kirchner’s leftist faction has emerged as a dominant group inside Peronism, with the president herself signaling that she planned to stay politically active right after stepping down in December, Mr. Macri’s margin of victory will aid him in the months ahead, analysts mentioned.
“He will be able to start off to operate with authority,” said Juan Cruz Díaz, a director at the Cefeidas Group, a political threat analysis firm. But he added that Mr. Scioli’s performance nevertheless demonstrated the underlying strength of the Peronist political movement. “It’s not a devastating margin of difference,” Mr. Cruz Díaz said. “With a fatigued government and an erratic campaign, it is a good performance. They are far from dead.”
Several political analysts in Argentina doubted that Mr. Macri would make it this far, with skepticism abounding when he started assembling his movement to the right of numerous rivals more than a decade ago.
He ventured into a part of Argentina’s political spectrum that had previously been associated with conservative Peronists or disgraced figures in the military establishment.
But over time, he honed his negotiating capabilities as the mayor of Buenos Aires, even though insisting during this year’s campaign that he did not program to roll back popular social programs introduced during the Kirchners’ presidencies, like money subsidies for poor households and “Soccer for Everyone,” a government initiative that covers soccer broadcasting costs so folks can watch matches cost-free.
Mr. Macri seemed to obtain the upper hand right after mounting a door-to-door campaign that helped his supporters win crucial provincial and neighborhood races in October, including the prized post of the governor of Buenos Aires Province, now held by Mr. Scioli but won by María Eugenia Vidal, a leading adviser to Mr. Macri and deputy mayor who focused largely on antipoverty applications in the municipal government.
Many voters have also expressed fatigue with Mrs. Kirchner’s governing style and reports of corruption amongst her prominent supporters.
Signaling that she could not strategy to stay subdued right after leaving office, Mrs. Kirchner issued a torrent of messages on Twitter on Sunday celebrating her foreign and domestic policies. A single message even seemed like a warning to Mr. Macri, who has vowed to improve Argentina’s strained ties with the United States and evaluation a contentious deal with China to construct a nuclear reactor.
“The individual with the duty of major the homeland must know the proper place of the Argentine republic in a multipolar globe,” Mrs. Kirchner wrote.
Mr. Macri’s “wager wasn’t an straightforward one,” the Argentine writer Martín Caparrós wrote in the Spanish newspaper El País. But Mr. Macri’s ambitions had been aided, Mr. Caparrós mentioned, by “12 years of rule by a couple that spoke as if from the left but acted in their own interests.”
Some voters, nonetheless, said that their fears over the threats to the government’s antipoverty applications outweighed criticism of the Kirchners or concerns that Mr. Scioli, viewed as friendlier to the organization establishment, was not as radical as they had hoped.
“I’m voting for the lesser of two evils,” stated Teo Levín, 25, a healthcare student who explained that he was voting for Mr. Scioli with gritted teeth. “I comprehend that Scioli will adopt come conservative economic policies, but he won’t destroy the political model. Macri will. He’s the worst factor in the planet.”
This entry passed by means of the Full-Text RSS service – if this is your content and you happen to be reading it on somebody else’s web site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.